Join 59,000+ subscribers on our free mailing list. Welcome to our new website. If you're already a member, put your e-mail in again to read all our articles
Please check your inbox and click the link to complete signup, Thank You!
Sorry, something went wrong. Please try again.
Please hold while we check our collection.
Skip to content

Does Manchester need a high speed train to Liverpool?

Mayors of Greater Manchester and Liverpool City Region Andy Burnham and Steve Rotheram, after missing a train. Photo: @MetroMayorSteve via X.

With government backing looking likely, we explore whether this is the best use of £17bn

Last month, proposals were released by Andy Burnham and his Liverpool counterpart Steve Rotheram for a brand-new Liverpool-Manchester Railway (LMR). And in the build-up to yesterday’s spending review, Chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed the government wanted to build a new line connecting the cities.

In her speech, Reeves outlined her plan to spend an additional £113bn on capital investment on top of what previous government had planned over the next four years, adding: “my ambition and the ambition of people across the north is greater still and so in the coming weeks I will set out this Government’s plans to take forward our ambitions on Northern Powerhouse Rail.”

Those plans will be laid out in the government’s 10-year infrastructure strategy, to be published some time next week. In the meantime, we thought we would look at the plans proposed by Burnham and Rotheram and get some insight from experts. Does Manchester really need a new high speed line to Liverpool?

This post is for paying subscribers only

Subscribe

Already have an account? Sign In

Share this story to help us grow- click here



Comments

How to comment:
If you are already a member, click here to sign in and leave a comment.
If you aren't a member, sign up here to be able to leave a comment.
To add your photo, click here to create a profile on Gravatar.

Latest