When my colleague Mollie Simpson started reporting on the strange goings on at the University of Greater Manchester early this year, she was met with a wall of denial.
Via a "media relations consultant" who used to be the editor of a local newspaper, the university hit back. At times, they went further than denials and suggested that our reporting was baseless, or even dishonest. University statements sent to us by the media relations consultant called the allegations Mollie had surfaced "potentially vexatious and increasingly extraordinary assertions" which we had obtained "primarily it appears from hearsay".
That wasn't all. The statement – dripping with the arrogance and condescension of an organisation that isn't used to scrutiny — said that “under the veil of investigative journalism” we had “threatened to make public unsubstantiated, potentially damaging, claims by former staff members". By doing our job and reporting very serious concerns of staff, the university said we were actually robbing those staff of the chance to address their concerns through the appropriate official procedures. And then the kicker: "...If indeed there are any which constitute legitimate issues."
I sit a few yards away from Mollie in the Mill office, and I remember the fury I felt when she read out that statement. Three months later, however, things look rather different.

This week, the university suspended its vice chancellor of 20 years, George Holmes, as a result of “serious allegations”, along with the provost and another senior member of staff. Two hours after his suspension, Greater Manchester Police officially confirmed they have an "active investigation" into the university.
The police statement says:
"This follows a review of allegations published in The Mill, and subsequent PwC report commissioned by the university’s Fraud Response Panel.”
You might remember that our investigation surfaced contracts and documents showing that senior executives at the university tried to divert hundreds of thousands in tuition fees – via a university recruitment partner in Casablanca – into a private company owned by one of them, a man called Joseph Wheeler. Mollie's reporting suggested that Holmes had been told about this deal, and despite several attempts, we could not get the university to explain why he allowed it to proceed. We also showed that the university was paying millions of pounds to Wheeler's tiny marketing company, despite Wheeler having no obvious background in higher education.
Mollie started this whole thing herself, by gaining the trust of key staff at the university and meticulously corroborating their claims. Initially, no one else in the media covered what was going on, despite the incredibly serious things we had uncovered, which are highly unusual at a public university in the UK. But within hours of Tuesday's news, the story was running on the BBC, The Guardian, The Times, The Telegraph, Times Higher Education and the Manchester Evening News.
Who knows what will happen next, but bravo to Mollie and the whole Mill team. After Jack Dulhanty and Abi Whistance had investigations long listed for Private Eye's Paul Foot award this month, this is another Mill Media reporter in her twenties who is achieving absolutely remarkable things. I feel like buying them all t-shirts emblazoned with 'Under the veil of investigative journalism' on the front.
The last thing I'll say is this: I want to publish a lot more investigations like this one. There are so many stories in Greater Manchester that require proper digging and the reason I know that is that we get sent tips and leads every week.
My problem is that we only have the resources to pursue a tiny proportion of the stories we get sent. We only have three staff writers, who work incredibly hard to get four great editions into your inbox every week. In the coming months, I want to strengthen our team by bringing in a specialised investigative editor and I want to add another reporter to the team, too.
I'll only do that when we have enough subscription income to justify those new roles, and that will only happen when we have hundreds more paying members. Right now, we have 3,415 and we want to reach the big target of 3,500 this month, just ahead of our fifth birthday. It would be a great moment for us, and it's also essential: this form of journalism only works if we have the backing of paying members. The alternative is ad-filled websites with celebrity clickbait all over them.
If you've been enjoying our work and you believe in the importance of investigative journalism, please join up now. You will be able to get your membership for just £4.95 a month for the first three months, a £4 discount from our usual price. In return, you'll get access to our entire back catalogue of members-only journalism, you'll receive eight extra editions per month, and you'll be able to come along to our fantastic members' events.
Plus, you'll allow us to reach 3,500 and carry on expanding the team. Just click that pink button below.

Comments
How to comment:
If you are already a member,
click here to sign in
and leave a comment.
If you aren't a member,
sign up here
to be able to leave a comment.
To add your photo, click here to create a profile on Gravatar.